Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0496

reference
156-tree-1
name
0496
tree-preservation-order

undefined

156-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.009726 50.851286)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.009670 50.851280,-1.009672 50.851291,-1.009680 50.851301,-1.009692 50.851309,-1.009708 50.851315,-1.009726 50.851317,-1.009743 50.851315,-1.009759 50.851310,-1.009772 50.851302,-1.009780 50.851292,-1.009783 50.851281,-1.009781 50.851270,-1.009773 50.851260,-1.009761 50.851252,-1.009745 50.851247,-1.009727 50.851245,-1.009710 50.851246,-1.009694 50.851251,-1.009681 50.851259,-1.009673 50.851269,-1.009670 50.851280)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL